Late on January 22 and into January 23, 2026, the US House Foreign Affairs Committee advanced the bipartisan AI Overwatch Act, giving Congress veto power over exports of high‑performance AI chips to countries such as China, Russia and Iran. The bill would also codify and tighten existing controls by banning Nvidia’s next‑generation Blackwell chips from being sold to China for at least two years.
This article aggregates reporting from 5 news sources. The TL;DR is AI-generated from original reporting. Race to AGI's analysis provides editorial context on implications for AGI development.
The AI Overwatch Act marks a major escalation in Washington’s attempt to treat advanced AI chips like strategic weapons. By putting Congress squarely in the loop on export licenses and explicitly targeting Nvidia’s most powerful datacenter GPUs, lawmakers are signaling that access to cutting-edge compute is now viewed as a core lever of national security, on par with arms sales.([voachinese.com](https://www.voachinese.com/a/us-house-panel-approves-congressional-control-of-ai-chip-exports-20260122/8105679.html)) For the race to AGI, this reinforces a world where the availability of high-end accelerators is shaped as much by geopolitics as by market demand.
The near-term impact will be most acute for Chinese companies, which already face a patchwork of licensing restrictions and now risk a statutory ban on future Nvidia Blackwell shipments. Over time, this will push China harder toward domestic GPU efforts and alternative architectures, while cementing the US, its allies, and a few chip giants as gatekeepers of frontier compute. For US labs, the bill is a double-edged sword: it may preserve their relative edge, but it also injects political oversight into what chips can be sold where, making global scaling strategies more complex.

